One of my friends said, “Look at the rich technical vocabulary of English. Isnt it amazing that today we have so many new words created in English like Computer, Processor, Monitor, Internet, Hardware, Software etc that it is almost impossible to create words with similar meaning in other languages and so instead we will have to directly import these english words into our languages to keep pace with the rapidly evolving new terms.”
“Very True.”, I said, “Any language during the time period of its peak usage as a spoken language will have its words imported into other languages that exist during that period. Just like the way Sanskrit words which got imported into Greek, Latin, Persian, etc during the peak usage of Sanskrit. These Sanskrit words have today silently formed a vast majority of the Original English Language!”.
And then I explained to him the Sanskrit source of various English words and he was quite surprised – not because he didnt knew it all these days, but because he had failed to recognize the obvious phoenetic connection that existed between words in his Indian language (which is again derived from Sanskrit) and similar sounding words with similar meaning in English!
So I thought I better pen down a list of all such English words derived indirectly from the ancient Sanskrit.
But before that, as usual a small preface
The World’s Oldest Known Literary work (around 3700 BCE) - the Vedas – the root source of the Indian and Hindu Philosophy and Spirituality – are written in Sanskrit. The time difference between the world’s next oldest literary work (Ancient Sumerian Texts – around 2600 BCE) and the vedas is about a millenium ie a thousand years!
“The Sanskrit language, whatever be its antiquity, is of wonderful structure; more perfect than the Greek, more copious than the Latin, and more exquisitely refined than either, yet bearing to both of them a stronger affinity, both in the roots of verbs and in the forms of grammar, than could not possibly have been produced by accident; so strong indeed, that no philologer could examine them all three, without believing them to have sprung from some common source which, perhaps, no longer exists; there is a similar reason, though not quite so forcible, for supposing that both the Gothick and the Celtick, though blended with a very different idiom, had the same origin with the Sanskrit; and the old Persian might be added to the same family”
So said Sir William Jones – the English Philologist who for the first time in 1786 suggested in his book “The Sanscrit Language” that Greek and Latin were related to Sanskrit and perhaps even Gothic, Celtic and Persian languages were related to Sanskrit.
It was this work which later gave birth to the so called Proto-Indo-European theory which instead of looking into Sanskrit being the root language of all Indo-European languages, suggests that all Indo-European languages including Sanskrit came from another so far unheard of language called PIE or Proto-Indo-European language.
Well, the irony is that till today there is no literature in the world about the so called PIE. There is no inscription found anywhere in the world written in the so called PIE. Nobody knows how the PIE was. Nobody knows who spoke it or in which part of the world was it spoken. No known ancient culture in the world talks about such a language being the root of the language they spoke. Simply put there is NO PROOF about the existence of this language. Just look at its name. It was a name GIVEN to it. A language if spoken will definitely contain words referring to everything that the people who spoke it could identify, yet here is a language which doesnt even have a name referring to itself!
So then what is the basis of having introduced this language in the language tree in the first place - a language which will remain invisible forever? Might be a guess, Max Muller used to guess a lot like this about the vedas, which he then retreated later.
Be it Greek Latin English Hindi Lithuanian – Sanskrit is the mother of all Languages. Even Scholars like Voltaire, Immanuel Kant etc believed that Sanskrit was the root of all Indo-European languages.
“I am convinced that everything has come down to us from the banks of the Ganges” said Voltaire. He believed that the “Dynasty of Brahmins taught the rest of the world”.
“Mankind together with all science must have originated on the roof of the world ie the Himalayas” declared Immanuel Kant.
About PIE – No idea, they are all linguistic experts who created this language, Oops, I mean its existence – for the language itself is not known yet. I am not an expert to speak on PIE, might be those who speak about it are experts in this language
All I do is present below a list of English words which are derived from Latin/Greek/Persian which are in turn derived from Sanskrit. Indians will be quick enough to recognize these words in their own language since most Indian languages have also originated from Sanskrit and even the other languages have a great deal of Sanskrit influence on them.
And here goes the list of English words derived from Sanskrit.
NOTE: Just to make it clear the below list does not contain Sanskrit words that have been directly borrowed into English in recent times like Karma, Avatar, Mantra, Guru, Cheetah, Pundit, Juggernaut, Nirvana, Lakh etc but lists only those English words which were derived from Sanskrit as English evolved by borrowing words from Greek/Latin etc.
| Root Sanskrit Word | Median Word in Latin(L) / Greek(G) / Arabic(A) | Derived English Word |
|---|---|---|
| Gau (meaning Cow) | Bous (G) | Cow |
| Matr (meaning Mother) | Mater (L) | Mother |
| Jan (meaning Generation) | Genea (G) | Gene |
| Aksha (meaning Axis) | Axon (G) | Axis |
| Navagatha (meaning Navigation) | Navigationem (L) | Navigation |
| Sarpa (meaning Snake) | Serpentem (L) | Serpent |
| Naas (means Nose) | Nasus (L) | Nose |
| Anamika (means Anonymous) | Anonymos (G) | Anonymous |
| Naama (means Name) | Nomen (L) | Name |
| Manu (means First Human) | ?? | Man/Men/Human |
| Ashta (meaning Eight) | Octo (L) | Eight |
| Barbara (meaning Foreign) | Barbaria (L) | Barbarian |
| Dhama (meaning House) | Domus (L) | Domicile |
| Danta (meaning Teeth) | Dentis (L) | Dental |
| Dwar (meaning Door) | Doru | Door |
| Dasha (meaning Ten) | Deca (G) | Deca |
| Madhyam (meaning Medium) | Medium (L) | Medium |
| Kaal (meaning Time) | Kalendae (L) | Calendar |
| Kri (meaning To Do) | Creatus (L) | Create |
| Mishra (meaning Mix) | Mixtus (L) | Mix |
| Ma (meaning Me/My) | Me (L) | Me |
| Pithr (meaning Father) | Pater (L) | Father |
| Bhrathr (meaning Brother) | Phrater (G) | Brother |
| Loka (meaning Place) | Locus (L) | Locale |
| Maha (meaning Great) | Magnus (L) | Mega |
| Mala (meaning Dirt/Bad) | Malus (L) | Mal as in Malicious, Malnutrition, Malformed etc |
| Makshikaa (meaning Bee) | Musca (L) (Meaning Fly) | Mosquito |
| Mrta (meaning Dead) | Mortis (L) | Murder |
| Na (meaning No) | Ne | No |
| Nakta (meaning Night) | Nocturnalis (L) | Nocturnal |
| Paad (meaning Foot) | Pedis (L) | Ped as in Pedestrial, Pedal etc |
| Pancha (meaning Five) | Pente (G) | Penta, Five |
| Parah (meaning Remote) | Pera (G) | Far |
| Patha (meaning Path) | Pathes (G) | Path |
| Raja / Raya (meaning King) | Regalis (L) | Royal |
| Sama (meaning Similar) | Similis (L) | Similar |
| Sapta (meaning Seven) | Septum (L) | Seven |
| Sharkara (meaning Sugar) | Succarum | Sugar / Sucrose |
| Smi (meaning Smile) | Smilen (L) | Smile |
| SthaH (meaning Situated) | Stare (L) (meaning To Stand) | Stay |
| Svaad (meaning Tasty) | Suavis (L) | Sweet |
| Tha (meaning That) | Talis (L) | That |
| Tva (meaning Thee) | Dih | Thee |
| Vachas (meaning Speech) | Vocem (L) | Voice |
| Vahaami (meaning Carry) | Vehere (meaning to Carry) (L) | Vehicle |
| Vama / Vamati (meaning Vomit) | Vomere (L) | Vomit |
| Vastr (meaning Cloth) | Vestire (L) | Vest |
| Yauvana (meaning Youth) | Juvenilis (L) | Juvenile |
| Narangi (meaning Orange) | Naranj | Orange |
| Pippali (meaning Pepper) | Piperi (G) | Pepper |
| Chandana (meaning Sandalwood) | Santalon (G) | Sandalwood |
| Chandra (meaning Moon) | Candela (L) (meaning light / torch) | Candle |
| Chatur (meaning Four) | Quartus (L) | Quarter |
| Shunya (meaning Zero) | Cipher (A) | Zero |
| a (prefix meaning “not” ex: gochara – agochara) | a (L)(G) (prefix meaning “not”) | a (prefix meaning “not” ex: theiest-atheist |
| an (prefix meaning “not” ex: avashya – anavashya) | un (L)(G) (prefix meaning “not”) | un (prefix meaning “not” ex: do-undo |
| Arjuna (meaning Charm of Silver) | Argentinum (L) | Argentinum – Scientific Name of Silver |
| Nava (meaning New) | Novus (L) | Nova – New |
| Kafa (meaning Mucus) | Coughen | Cough |
| Mithya (meaning Lie) | Mythos (G) | Myth |
| Thri (meaning Three) | Treis (G) | Three |
| Mush (meaning Mouse) | Mus (L) | Mouse |
| Maragadum (meaning Emerald) | Smaragdus (L) | Emerald |
| Ghritam (meaning Ghee) | ?? | Ghee |
| Srgalah (meaning Jackal) | Shagal (Persian) | Jackal |
| Nila (meaning Dark Blue) | Nilak (Persian) | Lilac |
| Srgalah | Shagal (Persian) | Jackal |
| Man (Ma as in Malaysia) (meaning Mind) | Mens (L) | Mind |
| Upalah (meaning Precious Stone) | Opalus (L) | Opal |
| Vrihis (meaning Rice) | Oriza (L) | Rice |
| Upalah (meaning Precious Stone) | Opalus (L) | Opal |
Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2009
loading...
loading...






the scientific name for pineapple is Ananas Comosus
loading...
loading...
That is amazing isn’t it?
loading...
loading...
The scientific (Latin) name for Pineapple is Ananas Comosus!
loading...
loading...
Great post and Great discussion.
loading...
loading...
Thank you very much Kannan! Your blog is great too!! Good work
loading...
loading...
Dear Guruji,
Amazing… is all what I can say. I am writing this only for conveying a point. We as Indians find it easy to understand this truth. Most others would find it difficult to accept that anything came from a country that is beneath them (beneath them in their financial eyes). No matter how many times a lie is repeated by the most powerful communities today, a lie is still a lie.
On the other hand, if we as Indians learn,appreciate and practise our language more and more and make it more and more powerful,no force can diminish the light that emancipates from us,cos we are just repeating the truth!.It is sad that when some westerners write books on our sanskrit,we appreciate it. I wish we Indians would state these things on our own.
Who wants their acceptance!.Didnt we tide out time without them? As Indians we should chant these things boldly!Dont feel scared of their ridicule.The bottom line is,if we develop our roots and our financial position, then most of the world will yield(even if we dont want them to yield).
Its all finance based eyes in this world.If india was the richest country,everyone including Indians would have no problem in accepting the truth of Sanskrit.Its a shame,but nevertheless we should always strive and make ourselves more powerful financially and keep learning and practising our culture including the mother of all language Sanskrit until the world either yields or goes for a senseless war…in which case…the universal rule would then apply. Dharma samsthapanarthaya…sambavami yuge yuge!.
Adharma will lose. But for that the Arjuns and Bheems of india need to stand boldly and develop financially and state what they believe in boldly!.We are not lying! y shud we be scared!.Find out more about sanskrit ourselves,practise it more,clean our country and lets together revive our true position in the world!.The world SHALL KNEEL IN RESPECT…NOT FEAR.. AND YIELD.
loading...
loading...
Dear Gurudev,
You inspire me just the way my Yoga guru at yogashree inspires me. Keep up the good work and step up the gas for an enlightened Maha”Bharata”. I wish learn to spread lost glory about our great country and Hindutva. That way everyone will learn the Hindu way of life of living and learning in harmony with nature fellow human beings. Congratulations on taking the initiative.!
As they say at Yogashree….
Ayshman Bhavatu
Keertiman Bhavatu
Mangalam Bhavatu
Shubham Bhavatu
loading...
loading...
Dear Dr.Ashwin Sawant,
Points are useful and informative. But just a correction Reg point 2) Veda’s creation and origin
Vedas are “Apaurusheya”.. not human creation..but God creation.
They are not in writtern form .. they are in “Nada/Shruti” form.
The existing oldest Veda scripts are in Sanskrit language.
God shows the benifit of following Vedas to mankind by setting himself as example by Vedas usage. And the origin is not India but universal… but been followed and not destroyed only in India. For eg: There were 108 Sri Ganapathy temples across the world .. like Japan, China, South America etc. but were destroyed except in India . India is the place where Hindu dharma and Vedas are “Avicchinna” – can not be destroyed…
Correct any mistakes above.
- ursri
loading...
loading...
Dear Gurudev,I’m Dr.AshwinSawant,from Mulund,Mumbai. I wish to present some points in ur support:
1.Vindhyas r d latest Azoic rocks of India of pre-Cambrian age which proves India to be a land in the latest Azoic times,somewhere in 70,000,000 and 60,000,000 yrs.
2.Vedas are accepted as most ancient literature in the world
created by mankind,which are doubtlessly Indian in origin.Vedas do not mention any place outside India as origin of Creaters Writers of Vedas.
3.In Vedic Literature Himalaya Mountain is mentioned as “Uttaram Girim(i.e.Northern Mountains)In case creators of Vedas ( & of Sanskrit language) had been foreigners ,they should have called these mountains as Eastern or Southern Mountain.
loading...
loading...
Very well said Dr. Ashwin, thank you very much for that info.
loading...
loading...
Gurudev please go through below link if you have not seen it already ….
This is an entirely different/new angle on language Sanskrit itself
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/sanskrit_exposure.htm
waiting for your comments
loading...
loading...
Sainath, the text in the link is the longest joke I have ever read, no comments on its contents
Just to comment about the title, if Sanskrit was never spoken then how come there are literary works in that language thousands of years apart in time? Without being spoken how did the language cross generations? Why would somebody write grammar books on a language nobody ever spoke and if nobody ever spoke it then who created it and why? No language can be ALWAYS DEAD, it might become extinct, but at some point of time earlier it HAS TO BE SPOKEN else it can never be there in the first place, and this common sense is missing from the author. And look at the english, my God
Just one example, if Ram Mohan Roy opposed Sanskrit then why did he translated Upanishads to Bengali? Great jokes…
There is another such longest joke by some such so called author, the name of that book is “Why I am not a Hindu”, read it and I bet you will enjoy the ignorance in it. Please dont take it seriously, we will definitely have to forgive that author for he doesnt know what he is talking about
loading...
loading...
Gurudev,
From what I understand, the origins of Sanskrit letter is also very interesting. The work was carried out by Bharatwaj rishi. A bamboo stick was taken and a piece of cloth/bag tied at one end and dust introduced into the bamboo. Each letter was chanted for nearly six hours and this caused the dust particles to align itself as per the letter chanted. Can you please verify this, would it be in in vedic scrpitures under Kalpa shaastra?
loading...
loading...
Thats really interesting info Prakashji, and thank you very much for that. Things look so scientifically accurate and well planned and designed. Infact using the root elements of Sanskrit new words can be created for any new inventions or findings of the future.
loading...
loading...
I was seeing discovery channel and suddenly i was shocked when host there told that in Freanch pineapple is called “Ananas”. Infact “Ananas” is what we/ I call it(pineapple) in marathi.
:)
So from marathi or sanskrit.
sanskrit/Marathi French
Ananas <—> Ananas
loading...
loading...
Very interesting Akshay. Thank you very much for letting us know this, even in Kannada it is Ananas
loading...
loading...
sanskrit latin/greek english
Ashwa Equus Equestrian
Kramelak Camelus/kemalos Camel
Manthan Manthanein/Mathema Mathematics
Yugam Jugum Yoke
Ugra via german Anger
Chitrkaya Cheeta
Janu Genu Genuflect
Dhara Terra Terra-
Ghas via geman Grass
There are many more but I am too tired to type right now
loading...
loading...
Great Dhruv, thank you very much for that
loading...
loading...
May I add few words to your great compilation?
loading...
loading...
few more to above list
hruday – heart
mana/manas – mind
anga – organ
gam (verb dhatu- ) – go
garv-arrogance.
.
.
list is endless
loading...
loading...
Cool compilation…
Thought to add MaxMuller intrepretation of history, geography, language etc etc… motive behind it…
Its difficult to tell and listen truth – blunders in our History(not just India’s)
So this is a wise step towards telling the truth- zara hatke…
loading...
loading...
Thank you very much ursri
loading...
loading...
Regarding the word ghrtam for ‘ghee’ i would like to add that in the PIE, the root is “ghrein” meaning “to apply, smear or anoint” since anointing or applying ghee was a major use.the greek word “christos” is a descendant of the word “ghrein” meaning “the anointed one”.
loading...
loading...
ಈನೋ ನಿಮ್ಮ ದಯೆ – An attempt with the help of quilpad
loading...
loading...
Super!
loading...
loading...
<<सन्तोष वार्ता >> क्रुपया पश्यतु http://www.24dunia.com/english-news/shownews/0/Sanskrit-is-second-Rajbhasha-in-Uttarakhand/5039588.html
loading...
loading...
ಅತಿ ಉತ್ತಮ:
loading...
loading...
Agree with you on this, works by many western scholars are very much appreciable, especially by Stephen Knap. he is fully knowledgeable than we many Indians.
I think Thava’s was a generic statement considering few western criticizing souls. In-fact a considerable fraction of us are troubled/troubling the growth of Sanskrit.
loading...
loading...
well.it has been a fashion for western scholars and researchers to sideline vedic history and sanskrit..
loading...
loading...
Not all! Westerners like Stephen Knapp, David Frawley etc are working dedicatedly to preserve and spread the vedic culture and Sanskrit. Infact they know more about the ancient vedic culture and Sanskrit than most of the people in this country!
loading...
loading...
संस्क्रुतम् एवम् मात्तूर्(षिमोग)ग्रामस्य संबन्ध भवान् जानति किला?
loading...
loading...
मत्तूर ग्रामस्य संबन्ध अहं जानामि
loading...
loading...
You are right Shabana
loading...
loading...
i know what pradeeps say and I am happy that whatever i learnt in sixth standard is still retained in my memory is somewhat vaguely … foolish people have five symptoms pride, fowl mouthed,haught tempered,bull headed and arrogant(disrespecting others words).
loading...
loading...
Perfect Shabana.
loading...
loading...
डेन् महोदयस्य वादानुवाद् पठित्वा ‘कन्चिन् देशे एकः राजः आसित्” एतत् कथा स्म्रिति मध्ये आगतवन्तः!!!
“मूर्खस्य पंच चिन्हानि ‘गर्वा, दुर्वचनं, क्रोधश्च, द्रिढवादश्च परवाक्येष्वनादरः”
loading...
loading...
भवान सम्यक उक्तवान
loading...
loading...
vatika -> vatican
loading...
loading...
Haha. Good one
loading...
loading...
It’s true that Sanskrit is a very ancient language, but I’m going to side with the PIE theorists here.
PIE is the theoretical ancestral mother tongue of humans inhabiting the Euro-Asian continent. It was constructed by linguists with the intention of perhaps displaying the apparent relationship and relatedness of the many languages spoken today in the European continent and the Indian subcontinent. It was not created to be definitive, but as an aid to understanding the evolution of language.
It is proven that the languages of Europe, apart from Basque, are related. They all are descendants from a common ancestral language. It is also proven that the languages of India are related to those spoken in Europe. They all share a common ancestor and Sanskrit is amongst them.
Nobody knows what the TRUE ancestral language sounded like - it’s no longer spoken - but with PIE we can get a (hopefully) close approximation.
Sanskrit is old, but it’s not as old as the Proto-Indo-European language needs to be to claim to be the true mother tongue.
loading...
loading...
Well Dane. What I dont understand is why to invent an unknown unheard of language. What are the issues in considering Sanskrit itself to be the PIE?
When we dont even know who spoke PIE, where and when – how can we say that PIE is older than Sanskrit? We have no literature in PIE, no civilization which spoke PIE, no evidence of the existence of PIE in any other ancient language literature and so on. So I see no point in holding on to PIE.
Initially the same linguists strongly resisted the very suggestion that English, Latin, Greek were related to Sanskrit. Then when it became an unavoidable truth, suddenly PIE was born out of nowhere as the root of all Indo-European languages, else the title would go to Sanskrit. While the ancient Sanskrit dates back to atleast 3100 BCE, latin was still in its infancy even at around 500 BCE – so not sure how even chronologically PIE makes any sense.
loading...
loading...
एतत् ब्ळोग् अत्युत्तमं
loading...
loading...
धन्यवादः
loading...
loading...