Comments on: 50-50 Version of 20-20

By: Gurudev

Gurudev — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:38:51 +0000

Yes Rajneesh and ursri, that sounds more logical. Runs matter in cricket not wickets
As sainath said, one can also try 3 hit sixes each, will be more entertaining.

By: sainath

sainath — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:40:41 +0000

I think it should be all the three things to decide in cricket
1. 3 bowl out each team
2. 3 hit sixes each
3. 3 direct stumps hits each
if there is a tie in all these then may be some other option to decide as winner…..can be anything

By: ursri

ursri — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:09:47 +0000

Yes Rajneesh Kiran. What you said sounds logical. Even in hokey or footfall one can see the goal keeper defending the post. Its true even in tennis to receive the shot during egalite/tie. Batsman should play in Cricket tie breaker.

By: Rajneesh Kiran

Rajneesh Kiran — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:59:56 +0000

I think, for a cricket match rather than Bowl out, Both team should be allowed to bat one more over and who ever scores more should be the winner, Penalty shootout is apt for Football, bcause what matters there is Goals, Like that In cricket , more than wickets its runs which matters, so in case of a tie, both team should be allowed to bat for one more over ..