First and foremost, let me clarify that unlike most people think, Hinduism is not a religion in strict sense. It is more of a culture than a religion.
So what is the difference between a culture and a religion?
Religion centers around the God. Where as a culture centers around the way of living. Which is why you find in India for instance Chrisitian or Muslims following the Hindu culture! Even in Bangladesh you can find hindu cultures in muslim life! Chrisitians of Velankani in Tamilnadu follow the hindu culture. Velankanni is a Christian pilgrimage center, here Mother Mary is worshipped by Puja like how hindus do, Chariots are pulled like in hindu temples, there is the concept of prasadam (divine food) in the church like how Hindus give prasadam in the hindu temples.. etc
All other major religions of the world have a propounder, a person who founded the religion. Hinduism has none! Which is why it is called Sanaathana Dharma meaning eternal religion! No debate is blasphemous in Hinduism! Customs can be questioned any time! It does not dictate terms to people saying what woman or men should wear as dress etc. It is always open to debates. There has never been a “holy war” in Hinduism in the name of God! The very existence of God can be debated in Hinduism. Many ancient Indian Hindu texts contain such debates!
Coming back to the concept of God in Hinduism, unlike other religions like Christianity or Islam, it does not talk about a God who stays outside the universe and creates/destroys this universe. Instead here Universe itself is the God! Universe is a self aware Paramaatma (the universal soul) and everything else in the universe is a part of this God! We are all Aatma (souls) whose goal is to realize and unite with this Paramaatma (Universal Soul). Even quantum mechanical physicists like Bohr,Heisenberg, Shcrodinger etc got interested in Vedic texts and Hinduism when they saw that quantum level consciousness of particles was already explained in Hinduism!! For more details read the books like The Dancing Wu Li Masters, The Tao of Physics etc
The Vedas compare creation to a spider’s web, that the spider creates and then lies within. God is both the container of the universe and what is contained in it.
Which is why the sacred vedic texts of Hinduism say “Aham Brahmasmi” which means I am God. This is because I, you and all are a part of this Universal God! Which is also the reason why you find 33 crore Gods in hinduism!! Since Universe itself is the God, everything else and everybody else in the Universe is also a form of God! Which is why Hindus worship water, rain, thunder, earth, moon, sun, stars, sky, humans, trees, plants, animals, air, father, mother, elders, light, wealth, knowledge, anything and everything that you find in this universe as God!
Which is also the reason why a Hindu if by accident happens to touch an animal or a person or a book etc by feet accidentally, then immediately he/she will do a symbolic gesture by hand asking to be forgiven for having shown disrespect to the God in that animal/person/book or whatever by accident.
The hindu prayer that has to be recited every day early morning as soon as one gets up ends saying “paadasparsham kshamasva me” which means “Oh Mother Earth, Please forgive me for I will be touching you with my feet for the rest of the day!”. Such a nice concept. Can a culture get any more beautiful than this?
Now comes an even more beautiful part of the Hindu Concept of God. The sacred Vedic texts say “Ekam Satya Vipro Bahuda Vadanthi” which means “God is one. Learned scholars call him/her with different names”. This simple yet so wonderful concept makes it unique among all religions! You cannot be a Christian and say I will worship Vishnu or Allah! Christianity doesn’t allow that. You cannot be a Muslim and say I will worship Shiva or Jesus!! Islam doesn’t allow that.
But you can be a Hindu and still say that I will worship Jesus or Allah! Hinduism has no objection. In fact it says you can worship God in any name! Which is why you can find Hindus in India going to Churches, Jain temples, Buddhist temples, Sikh Gurudwaras etc. If all religions were as open minded as Hinduism there would have been no religious fanaticism or religious hatred on this planet and Earth would have been a better place to live in! There would have been no terrorism either!
Which is also the reason why unlike other religions you will find no missionaries or evangelists in Hinduism who promote Hinduism and want to convert entire world into Hinduism! Hinduism does not believe in religious conversions either by force or by bribing or by appeasement. You can be a Hindu and still be a Christian or Mulsim at the same time! You can even be a Christian or Muslim and say that you dont believe in Hinduism, and still Hinduism looks at you as a great soul! It does not say that you will be punished or sent to hell or will become a sinner for not believing in Hindu God! You can even be an atheist! You can say that you don’t want to call the Universal soul as a God! In fact Atheism is like a subclass of Hinduism! Charvaka who lived in 600 BCE was an atheist and pioneered a materialistic movement within Hinduism and even Madhavacharya (he was a 14th century philosopher who wrote a wonderful book Sarva darshana sangraha with a lot of material on atheism, dont confuse him with Madhvacharya of udupi) etc were Atheists and still followed the Hindu Culture!
Infact, the sacred Hindu texts, the Vedas talk more about humans and life than about God! They say, “Vasudaiva Kutumbakam” which means “The entire world is a single huge family”! Look at the beauty, they don’t differentiate between people of this religion or that religion, entire Earth is a single family! The vedas also say “Sarve Jana Sukhino Bhavantu” which means “May all the people live happily”. Again here all humans are considered equal, there is no differentiation between Hindus and others!!
God if exists, is after all one and the same. You call a Rose by any name, and still it continues to be a Rose. Why should we fight for the name? It doesn’t make any real sense, does it?
By the way, you can also read about the role and status of women in the ancient Indian vedic culture here .
loading...
loading...






“”Shame in worshipping Ganesha, Hanuman, etc “”
Why shame? Just dont believe in inherent supremacy of Humans to other Creatures of God. Rest assured, You no longer feel shame of it.
loading...
loading...
“”initially felt bad when geeta wrote dat thr wer some quotes which hury women but felt gud when i read ur reply dat thr r no such quotes. “”
I dont agree. No offence, Gurudev bhai. But you simply evaded to counter the Geeta’s doubts/questions to the point( Except ofcourse in the case of RamCharitManas).
Someone explain me… why those kind of misogynistic verses(?) in Vedas? or they are tampered ones? [:)]
loading...
loading...
“”I would like to remind the readers that most of the vedas available these days on the Internet (eg., Max Muller, Maurice Bloomfield) are not the original ones. (Need not mention about their translations). There have been some posts on the Internet gathering a few hymns of vedas (available on the Internet) and saying that Hinduism doesn’t respect women. I hope youngsters don’t carried away by those works.”"
RamaKrishna ji,
If not the web, where can we get authentic Versions? Please let us know.
I’m reading Vedas in sanskrit from here http://www.sanskritweb.org/
Not sure about their authenticity, though !
loading...
loading...
Yes Ramakrishna, you are right, which is why I try not to rely on translations as far as possible.
loading...
loading...
Ursri and Gurudev
Thanks for giving a lot of wonderful information.
I would like to remind the readers that most of the vedas available these days on the Internet (eg., Max Muller, Maurice Bloomfield) are not the original ones. (Need not mention about their translations). There have been some posts on the Internet gathering a few hymns of vedas (available on the Internet) and saying that Hinduism doesn’t respect women. I hope youngsters don’t carried away by those works.
The concept of God and soul is nicely explained in both Bhagavadgita and (Shankaracharya’s) VivekachooDaamaNi. I urge the readers to read them to understand the Vedic view of God. Good translations are available for them – but it would be good to understand SamskRtam and read them.
Thank you,
loading...
loading...
Balraj
Please refer to the comments by ursri above in this page. ursri has provided some detailed explanations regarding the origins of the concept of 330 million gods.
loading...
loading...
Gurudev, is there some literature or place where I can learn more about the concept of 330 million Gods. I am struggling to understand how we arrived at the number 330 million. I read your explanation, but it does not do it for me. Any help is much appreciated.
As a youth I was ashamed of the concepts of many Gods, sati, caste, child marriage, Brahmin alone being priests, idol worship, Ganesha, Hanuman, etc only because I lacked the proper understanding from parents who could not explain to my liking. I went to Catholic School all my life, but remined a Hindu because my parents were Hindus.
I struggled to appreciate and love my heritage which I believe is the the greatest by its sheer depth, beauty and sacientific understanding. I now come to desire more understanding because of my growing appreciation for its scientific depth.
There are lots of information in Hinduism that are not well understood by us Hindus, and as a result many Hindus, especially the Hindu youths, have little or no explanation when confronted by friends of other religious persuasions with their distortions of our religious beliefs. As a result, we live in a kind of shame, and sometimes not even know it as shame.
Sometimes we leave the Hindu way of life in search of another way, and we sometimes live in silent, painful regret of it, not knowing how to return when we rediscover who we are.
Many of us deal with shame by hiding it, as if we dealt with it, and we never learn to get beyond it. As a result we live like Hindus, but in a depressed way, because we fail to understand the full meaning of our way of life, and show our pride in knowing and understanding why we are who we are.
I don’t know if I am explaining myself well, but that is how I have felt over the years, until now with new confidence in who I am, and as I reflect back in how I understood Hinduism since my childhood.
Here is a link that can be helpful to many of us Hindus who have issues with Hinduism.
loading...
loading...
Thanks a lot for your wishes san.
loading...
loading...
hi gurudev
i dont remember how i ended up to ur webpage but m really happy coz itz very informative. thrz so much hindu bashing datz goin on in our country which really is very irritating. wanted to know the truth and datz y started browsin abt hinduism, vedas etc. your blogs are wonderful. keep them goin . was reading the debate between u and geeta. initially felt bad when geeta wrote dat thr wer some quotes which hury women but felt gud when i read ur reply dat thr r no such quotes.
keep goin and continue the good work. thx a lot for all this true information.
loading...
loading...
First of all thank you so much Gurudev.
My reading is quite snail pace. Your article made me read quite fast and helped me to understand what i read as I should be careful while putting it down right.
loading...
loading...
Thanks ursri
I learnt a lot from your writings
loading...
loading...
Sainath, here goes abstract on Brahma.
Before detailing How Indian philosophical world view and can be placed in current physics, I shall place abstract on Brahma – desription first.
Source : Vedas The source of Ultimate Science
Brahma is the avyakta(non-comprehensible) sub-stratum. When he whishes to be discriminate, vyakta(comprehensible), He does so by first forming the avyakta space, avyakta time and counsciousness or the three Gunas:
1. SAT (Vishnu) => nothing but substance => vastness=> pure wave (in physics) ,
Here Wave has no inertia
2. RAJ (Brahma) => thinking consciousness => creation
Infinite space and erterninity cannot be comprehended; only meditated upon. The process of comprehension brings them into finitude.
3. TAMA (Shiva) annihiliation=>time, eternity => pure oscillator
Here energy conservation from homogeneity of time, Oscillation needs inertia
It is still the avyakta substratum of the three Gunas in equilibrium. Brahma sets in the Task of Creation.
In Indian philosophy, the main terms used in Upanishad have dynamic connotations. The word Brahman or ?????? or Bramha(not braahman/braahmana) is derived from the Sanskrit root brih – to grow – and thus suggests a reality which is dynamic and alive. In the words of S. Radhakrishan, the word Brahman ?????? or Bramha means growth and is suggestive of life; motion and progress’. The Upanishads refer to Brahman ?????? as ‘ this unformed, immortal, moving ‘ thus associating it with motion even though it transcends all forms.
loading...
loading...
Gods as personifications of natural phenomena (The Vedic Gods – Last Section..)
The Vedic Risis also considered the devas (Gods) as personifications of natural phenomena. Gods(devas) are the personified agents of the rta – ?? or cosmic order or harmony whose ordinances shine through rta(Rgv X65.5). this rta implies that perfect exsting between the essence of being, sat and its activity, i.e., the inner and outer, the latter being but the effect and in some sense, the mirror of the former. It implies also the spontaneous rightness observable in the majestic movement of the stars, the recurrence of the seasons. Unerring rhythm of birth, growth, death of each form of life, that rhythm which is the very breath of the divine action.
But there are other aspects to the Gods, of eaqual weight, to be noted. Apart from being deities in their own right, cosmic agents who obey the great law-rta-of which they are willing instruments, divinities who won their own immortality long before man came upon the scene of this world, the devas are also, through their gifts to men, powers inherent in man through and by means of which man can enter into communion with and participate in the divine process. We catch here a glimpse of elaboreate inter linkedness of the cosmos and its creatures.
In Veda, the dual role or sometimes triple role has assigned to gods. For example Agni the divine force which builds the cosmos, the destruction energy which shatters unwanted forms; Agni is also great purifying agency hidden in all things and the “sacrificial priest” and invoke, the guest in the human tabernacle. Agni is the immortal in mortals which makes the gods manifest (Rgv. I 77) (krnoti devas). Again and again he is called upon to bring the gods “to birth” for his torch once kindled reveals in their fullness the divine powers both in man and the universe. Through that flame power hidden in man the latter becomes conscious of the other divine powers. The physical fact – fire – is made use of the figure of Agni as tangible taken to express the activity and impact of that other, intangible fire which keeps vigil in the darkness of human awareness and is made perceptible in the illumination of awakened man. The hidden divinity, the profound mystery of which no mind can solve, is beautifully expressed in the Yajur Veda (Yaj V. vs 32.8).
==== Shubham====
loading...
loading...
Gods as personifications of natural phenomena (The Vedic Gods – Last Section..)
The Vedic Risis also considered the devas (Gods) as personifications of natural phenomena. Gods(devas) are the personified agents of the rta – GiÉ or cosmic order or harmony whose ordinances shine through rta(Rgv X65.5). this rta implies that perfect exsting between the essence of being, sat and its activity, i.e., the inner and outer, the latter being but the effect and in some sense, the mirror of the former. It implies also the spontaneous rightness observable in the majestic movement of the stars, the recurrence of the seasons. Unerring rhythm of birth, growth, death of each form of life, that rhythm which is the very breath of the divine action.
But there are other aspects to the Gods, of eaqual weight, to be noted. Apart from being deities in their own right, cosmic agents who obey the great law-rta-of which they are willing instruments, divinities who won their own immortality long before man came upon the scene of this world, the devas are also, through their gifts to men, powers inherent in man through and by means of which man can enter into communion with and participate in the divine process. We catch here a glimpse of elaboreate inter linkedness of the cosmos and its creatures.
In Veda, the dual role or sometimes triple role has assigned to gods. For example Agni the divine force which builds the cosmos, the destruction energy which shatters unwanted forms; Agni is also great purifying agency hidden in all things and the “sacrificial priest” and invoke, the guest in the human tabernacle. Agni is the immortal in mortals which makes the gods manifest (Rgv. I 77) (krnoti devas). Again and again he is called upon to bring the gods “to birth” for his torch once kindled reveals in their fullness the divine powers both in man and the universe. Through that flame power hidden in man the latter becomes conscious of the other divine powers. The physical fact – fire – is made use of the figure of Agni as tangible taken to express the activity and impact of that other, intangible fire which keeps vigil in the darkness of human awareness and is made perceptible in the illumination of awakened man. The hidden divinity, the profound mystery of which no mind can solve, is beautifully expressed in the Yajur Veda (Yaj V. vs 32.8).
==== Shubham====
loading...
loading...
Thank you.
loading...
loading...
Very well written Chetanarupa
loading...
loading...
Suddenly, I hear you all — a thousand crickets chirping, the loudest sounding far from here; but wait – the loudest one, in fact, is tickling in my cricket ear. My fragile wings I quickly still; Pakshirajaya’s very near. Surely, I am the one cricket the king of birds would catch first! Only stillness saves me from being devoured (as things there are besides Death far worse).
Che [short for Chetanarupa]
loading...
loading...
We shall do that Sainath, we are encouraged by your interest.
@Gurudev
Gods as personifications of natural phenomena, is the last section under Vedic Gods.
If you think it is worth to start another topic on Universe/Trinity in Vedic view and relating to modern science, pls start so. Or mention which existing thread would be appropriate.
This would answer relation between , space, time with representation of trimurthies to explain dual nature of matter.
loading...
loading...
Sure Sainath, will definitely write a blog on it.
loading...
loading...
usri a request to you and gurudev….could you please add all the 33 devtas information in a 1 blog post here so that it will be better to read and understand and discuss on..
Thanks
loading...
loading...
Dear Gurudev
It is my pleasure to share the info as I am learning a lot in the process. Thank you for starting this topic.
It was my opportunity that I came across such wonderful book in a Sanskrit Prachar sabha while I was searching a reference book for my recently enrolled higher studies in Sanskrit. Many books talks on 64 kind of arts essential for general lively hood. It is surprising to see that most of advanced scientific queries are explained by authorized highly qualified professors including scientists of current genre (who depended up on Vedas).
Hope this info helps those who have quest for knowledge.
**********************************************
Here goes the info on
The Gods of The Rig Veda
The gods of Rig Veda period can be classified into various categories, some of the Gods and Goddesses they worshipped were as follows
Gods of the Sky or Heaven :
(a) Dyus – was the God of heaven and is amongst the most ancient of the deities
(b) Varuna – was the sovereign of the Universe was regulated the seasons. He had the overlordship of the cosmic waters and was, considered the regulator of the waters which caused the rivers to flow. In the Rig Veda it is mentioned that the people turned to Him for forgiveness of sins.
(c) Usha – was the Goddess of Dawn. She is described as the daughter of the sky, has Night for her sister and is related to Varuna.
(d) Surya – also called Savitri, was the Sun-God.
(e) Pushan – was name of a sun-god and was said to behold the entire Universe; is addressed as the guide of travelers and the protector of cattle.
Gods of the Atmosphere:
(a) Indra – was one of the most popular Gods and was God of thunder, rain and war. They believed that He fought against demons and protected the people. He also caused the rain to fall, giving them prosperity.
(b) Rudra – was the God of thunder and storm. Maruts are called sons of Rudra.
(c) Vayu – was the God of winds. He is associated with Indra and is regarded equally with him as representing or ruling over the atmosphere.
(d) Parjanya – was a God who presided over the lightening, the thunder, the rain and the procreation of plants and living creatures.
Gods of the Earth:
(a) Prithvi – was the goddess of Earth and is amongst the most ancient of all deities.
(b) Agni – was the God of fire and is one of the most prominent of the deities of the Vedas. He is said to be a son of Dyaus and Prithvi.
(c) Saraswati – was the river deity, who came to be regarded as the Goddess of Learning.
(I think this would be a good reference to Saraswati Darshan – The revelation of Sarasvati River article too). And give a death blow that Sarraswati River existence is not documented in ancient days
Although the ancients (the original text says Aryan: since Aryan is controversial therory.. I shall replace aryans with ancients for simplicity) worshipped many Gods, yet they believed in the existence of one supreme power as the creator of the entire universe. Apart from these Gods and Goddesses, the cosmos was supposed to be peopled by innumerable celestial beings. Gandharvas, Asuras, Vishvadevas and many others, here is no sign of the use of image-worship in Rig-Vedic times. The Gods were worshipped by means of sacrifice and prayers.
What the Vedic Gods represent has remained unsolved question till today. The Vedic thought provides a complete picture of the complexity of human minds and of its attempt at understanding of the order of the Universe, with rich promises of insights into human psyche – for one aspect of the gods, often over-looked, represents and externalization of certain features of the psyche.
Gods as personifications of natural phenomena…. in next post
loading...
loading...
Dear Gurudev
It is my pleasure to share the info as I am learning a lot in the process. It was my opportunity that I came across such wonderful book in a Sanskrit Prachar sabha while I was searching a reference book for my recently enrolled higher studies in Sanskrit. Many books talks on 64 kind of arts essential for general lively hood. It is surprising to see that most of advanced scientific queries are explained by authorized highly qualified professors including scientists of current genre (who depended up on Vedas).
Hope this info helps those who have quest for knowledge.
**********************************************
Here goes the info on
The Gods of The Rig Veda
The gods of Rig Veda period can be classified into various categories, some of the Gods and Goddesses they worshipped were as follows
Gods of the Sky or Heaven :
(a) Dyus – was the God of heaven and is amongst the most ancient of the deities
(b) Varuna – was the sovereign of the Universe was regulated the seasons. He had the overlordship of the cosmic waters and was, considered the regulator of the waters which caused the rivers to flow. In the Rig Veda it is mentioned that the people turned to Him for forgiveness of sins.
(c) Usha – was the Goddess of Dawn. She is described as the daughter of the sky, has Night for her sister and is related to Varuna.
(d) Surya – also called Savitri, was the Sun-God.
(e) Pushan – was name of a sun-god and was said to behold the entire Universe; is addressed as the guide of travelers and the protector of cattle.
Gods of the Atmosphere:
(a) Indra – was one of the most popular Gods and was God of thunder, rain and war. They believed that He fought against demons and protected the people. He also caused the rain to fall, giving them prosperity.
(b) Rudra – was the God of thunder and storm. Maruts are called sons of Rudra.
(c) Vayu – was the God of winds. He is associated with Indra and is regarded equally with him as representing or ruling over the atmosphere.
(d) Parjanya – was a God who presided over the lightening, the thunder, the rain and the procreation of plants and living creatures.
Gods of the Earth:
(a) Prithvi – was the goddess of Earth and is amongst the most ancient of all deities.
(b) Agni – was the God of fire and is one of the most prominent of the deities of the Vedas. He is said to be a son of Dyaus and Prithvi.
(c) Saraswati – was the river deity, who came to be regarded as the Goddess of Learning.
(I think this would be a good reference to Saraswati Darshan – The revelation of Sarasvati River article too). And give a death blow that Sarraswati River existence is not documented in ancient days
Although the ancients (the original text says Aryan: since Aryan is controversial therory.. I shall replace aryans with ancients for simplicity) worshipped many Gods, yet they believed in the existence of one supreme power as the creator of the entire universe. Apart from these Gods and Goddesses, the cosmos was supposed to be peopled by innumerable celestial beings. Gandharvas, Asuras, Vishvadevas and many others, here is no sign of the use of image-worship in Rig-Vedic times. The Gods were worshipped by means of sacrifice and prayers.
What the Vedic Gods represent has remained unsolved question till today. The Vedic thought provides a complete picture of the complexity of human minds and of its attempt at understanding of the order of the Universe, with rich promises of insights into human psyche – for one aspect of the gods, often over-looked, represents and externalization of certain features of the psyche.
Gods as personifications of natural phenomena…. in next post
loading...
loading...
Thanks ursri,
The information in your comments are adding a great value to this post
loading...
loading...
Number of Devtas (Continued..)
According to Yajurveda, there are thirty-three Devatas.
??????????????????? ??????????????????????? ?
RuyaastriMshataastuvata BootaanyashaamyanprajaapatiH |
Here ???? ?????? (traya stri) means thirty three.
Shatapatha Brahmana furnishes details of these thirty-three devatas as under:
- Eight Vasus
- Eleven Rudras
- Twelve Adityas
- One Indra
And
- One Prajapti.
All these devtas manifest gods’ might in their respective spheres and are helpful to us in our lives. The following are the further details of these thirty-three devatas.
(a) Vasus – Fire, Earth, Air, Sky, Moon, Stars and Heaven
(b) Rudras – Ten Pranas(vital airs) in the body viz.,
Prana, Apana, Vyana, Samana, Udana, Naga, Karm, Krikla, Devadatta, Dhananjaya and soul
- some describe them as ten sensory and motor organs in human body
I could able to appreciate our shodashopachara – 16 steps to honor God- Puja by relating these Rudras mentioned in Naivedya step. This has provoked me to find more reference of respecting nature in Pujas.
(c ) Aditya – These are twelve-12 months in an year
(d) Indra – Indra is indicative of power, vigour, vital force, electricity – (major element to cause thunder and initiate rain and many more)
(e) Prajapati ie., Yajna because through Yajna waters are purified and thus they sustain lives.
Besides, Yaju, in Atharvaveda too, there is a mention of these Thirthy-Three Devas
???? ?????????????? ???? ????? ???????? ??????
yasya trayastriMshad devaa nidhiM rakShanti sarvadaa
(Ath 10-7-23)
?????????????????? ???? ???? …… ????? ?
yasyatrayastriMshad devaa aMge …… viduH |
(Ath 10-7-27)
Whose secret treasure the thrity-three mighty forces of world always protect, who is amongst them, who knows this treasure which they guard carefully. The thirty-three cosmic elements withing the body are disposed as limbs and those learned men who know about Universe and its master know these thirty three cosmic powers
The Gods of The Rig Veda… in next post
loading...
loading...
Balraj
Nice to hear that the blog has inspired you and you are welcome back
loading...
loading...
Dear Balraj, pls come back to India. Hope the below info might inspire many more at abroad who are in dilemma to identify themselves, unable to break tie with Indian culture but worried about their children’s upbringing. Initially you may have to cope up with cultural shocks. Here is a useful link on How to Cope with Culture Shock
One of my friend’s brother worked in several countries. He is SAP consultant, made quite good amount of money even before Y2K. He aspired to return back to India. Parents informed that he should not say later that he left colorful life or whatever and came back to India for the sake of parents. But with humble he replied “”I have seen you both taking care of grand parent in spite of all limitations. Now I have sufficient money to support and don’t long for more. It is only my desire to follow your foot prints to serve you elders.”" Now he is settled with family, happy father of kid and working with reputed company too. We could see a satisfactory glow in his face when we just ask him if he is happy returning back to India. It is amazing to see such simple equally able who have taken responsibility what to teach to their younger generation.
loading...
loading...
This link is absolutely beautiful. There is nothing like it. I need this kind of inspiration, and I am moving fromthe US to live in India permanently.
loading...
loading...
The Vedic Gods .. Continued
Again Nirukta States (7.1) ..
?????? ?????????? ???
?????????????? ?????? ??????? ??????????????? ????? ? ??????? ?????
i.e., when God desiring to impart instructions regarding a particular subject-matter, describes its properties or qualities in a verse, it is said to have that object as devta.
Vedic “Devatas” are forces of objects, capable of illuminating them or explaining them to is, or which lights of lights are.
? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ?
ya tena ucyate saa devataa |
That which signifies a subject-matter of a verse is its ‘devta’
??????? ?? ?? ??????? ???? ?????? ???????? ????? ?????-???? ?
yujjate mana uta yujjate dhiyo vipraa viprasya bRUhato vipash-citaH |
(Yaju 11.4)
God is the fountain of knowledge; He is the knower of all acts, worlds and sciences and those who pick up His knowledge are learned persons and are called devas
(Shatpath 6.3.1.6)
From the above, it is clear that God is the fountain-head of knowledge and devtas are by themselves nothing, they derive their qualities from Him.
? ???? ?????? ???? ? ?????? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ??????????? ?
???? ??????????? ???? ???? ???? ???????? ?????? ?
na tatra sUryo Baati na candra taarakaM nemaa viGuto Baanti kutoyamagniH |
tameva BantamanuBaati sarva tasya Baasaa sarvamidaM viBaati ||
The Sun does not shine, nor the Moon, nor the Stars, much less these flashes of lightenings. He shines and everything shines as a result thereof.
In view of above, the ideas of Western scholars that these objects of nature are independent Gods, are not justified.
In action portion (Karmakanda) of the Veda i.e., the Yajurveda the word ‘Devta’ signifies the Vedic mantra, composed of meters (Gayatri, etc, etc). They are learned as such because they explain the method as to how to perform a particular act. A meter has that substance as its devta whose name occurs therein – The mantras are called cevtas because the learned, describe, express and bring to light all true sciences through them.
In fact all those who impart knowledge or form object of knowledge are devtas.
??????? ?? ??????? ??????? ???? ???? ?
??????? ????-?? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?? ?
punantu maa devajanaaH punantu manasaa dhiyaH |
punantu viS-vaa Butaani jaanavedaH punaahi maa ||
(Yaju 19.39)
From the foregoing facts, it is thus clear that Vedic devtas(gods, deities) are eternal forces of nature and are objects to impart knowledge of all kinds and to bring happiness, to uplift an individual and the society as a whole.
*******************************************
Coming next Number of Devatas
loading...
loading...
Nice to read more info on this.
loading...
loading...
The Vedic Gods
Source: A Book : Vedas: The Source of Ultimate Science
Author: Dr. Shri Ram Verma- Reader in Dept of Physics in DBS (PG).
Ph.D in Nuclear Physics from Aligarh Muslim University
Research in Nuclear Physics and Astrophycis- City University, New York (USA)
Vedic rishis were attracted by the bright and beautiful aspects of nature and so they worshiped the various forces of nature as manifestations of supreme GOD. Thus they worshipped a number of Nature Gods.
The word ‘Deva’ or ‘Devta’ is normally translated by western scholars and their followers in India, as deity or god. But this is an incorrect interpretation due to the fact that they have not tried to find out the root from which this word has been derived.
As per Nirukta “Dev” is derived from the words da, dut, dip and divu
???? ?????? ?? ???????? ????????? ?? ?????????? ?????????? ?? ?
(Nirukta 7-16)
According to it, knowledge, light, peace, delight and all those objects that give peace or pleasure are callaed “devtas”. This fact is borne by veda mantha itself.
????????????, ???? ?????, ?????? ?????, ???????? ????? ???? ?????
????? ??????????? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ??????????????????????? ????? ????? ??????
(Yajur 14-20)
Fir, air, Sun, Vasus(space or abode), Aditya(time), learned persons of contemplative mood, all useful and good objects, God the creator and protector of the Universe, Vedas, well earned riches and water are all devtas i.e., highly useful things.
Again Nirukta States (7.1) ..
***********************************
to be continued in next post
loading...
loading...
That was really informative ursri. Thanks a lot for that.
loading...
loading...
1 devine conqueror is also called as Brahma
The 12 adityas are:
12 Adityas (and 12 months) in the Vedanta:
1. Amsa (the share of the gods) Moon Surya
2. Aryaman (generous, nobility) Mercury Aryama
3. Bhaga (due inheritance) Venus Bhaga
4. Daksa (ritual skill) Mars Dhata
5. Mitra (constancy in friendship) Saturn Mitra
6. Pusan (prosperity) Pusha
7. Sakra (courage)
8. Savitr (power of words) Sun Savita
9. Tvastar (skill in craft and technique) Tvastha
10. Varuna (fate) Jupiter Varuna
11. Vishnu (cosmic law) Saturn Indra
12. Vivasvat (social law). [Jupiter]
Bhaktivedanta VedaBase: Srimad Bhagavatam
Vivasvan, Aryama, Pusha, Tvashta, Savita, Bhaga, Dhata, Vidhata, Varuna, Mitra, Satru and Urukrama.
In the Bramanas, there are also 12 Adityas, corresponding to the twelve months:
Aryaman
Bhaga
Daksa
Dhata
Indra
Mitra
Ravi
Savita
Surya
Varuna
Yama
Leo Brahma/Vishnu
Virgo Shukra
Libra Savitri
Scorpio Vivaswat
Sagittarius Indra/Pushan
Capricorn Twashtri
—————————–
Aquarius Bhaga
Pisces Mitra
Aries Rudra/Aryaman
Taurus Amsa
Gemini Varuna
Cancer Daksha
The 8 Vasus
8 Vasus are sometimes referred to as the 8 Elements, i.e. earth, fire, atmosphere and oceans, wind, sky, sun, mansions of moon and Soma.
Vasu 1. Prithivi
Vasu 2. Agni
Vasu 3. Antariksa
Vasu 4. Vayu
Vasu 5. Dyaus
Vasu 6. Surya
Vasu 7. Naksatra
Vasu 8. Soma
Dhara Earth
Anala Fire
Apa Waters
Anila Wind
Dhruva Pole Star
Soma Moon
Prabhasa Light
attendants of Indra
From Website: Vedic Pantheon
the names of the Vasus , according to the Vishnu-Purana , are
1. Apa [connected with {ap}, water]
2. Dhruva , the Pole-star
3. Soma , the Moon
4. Dhava or Dhara
5. Anila Wind
6. Anala or Pavaka Fire
7. Pratyusha the Dawn
8. Prabhasa Light
but their names are variously given
Ahan , Day being sometimes substituted for 1 ; in their relationship to Fire and Light they appear to belong to Vedic rather than Puranic mythology)
Cologne Sanskrit Dictionary under Vasu
Their names were Apa, Dhruva, Soma, Dhara, Salila, Anala, Pratyusha and Prabhasa.
loading...
loading...
About 33 Gods – Version 1
*******************************************
In the Hindu pantheon there are 33 Heavens and 33 Gods, i.e.:
1 Divine Conqueror (Sakra Deva)
1 Creator God Prajapati
12 Preserver Gods Adityas
11 Destroyer Gods Rudras
8 Elements Vasus
In another version there are:
12 adityas
8 vasus
11 rudras
2 asvins.
These 33 gods are called the Tridasa (3 x 10). The 33 gods + the trimurti (Brahma, Vishnu, Siva) leads to 36 gods. Cf. 36 tattva.
36 x 2 = 72 x 5 = 360
= 72 x 6 = 432
In Buddhist Cosmology the 33 Gods live in Tavatimsa, level 7 of the 31 planes of existence, i.e. the second of 6 Deva worlds.
The 33 gods linked with the idea of a god in each living being led to the notion of there being 330 million gods in the pantheon.
******************************************
An useful link about significance of numbers
http://sumscorp.com/kavai/newmethods/pages/keyword.php?KeywordID=1285&action=showDefinitions
loading...
loading...
gurudev just 1 thing. are there really 33 crores of god, i mean why doesn’t the number increase or decrease…in 1 of your post i had copy pasted some lines from wikipedia about the same. Do you have details over it?
And once again…you are 2 good…excellent gurudev…long live hunduism
loading...
loading...
Sree
I completely agree with you. Even in my native in the western ghats of Karnataka.. houses have this concept of forest zones behinf the houses… called haadi.. and I feel so happy when I go there.. people are coexisting with nature…
A true religion of nature..
loading...
loading...
I support Gurudev’s statement that Hindus are nature lovers. That is absolutely right. I would say by default they are. Our sacred texts say “”Taru devo Bhava: “” means trees are Gods. This is a warning for people not to hurt trees. I have seen something strange in Kerala to substantiate this. In the compounds /Estates owned by Hindus you often see many other trees that are not useful for human beings but used by birds & animals. Once the property is sold to any minority community member the first thing they do is cut down these “”unwanted”" trees. They tend to keep only the trees that are beneficial to them. I feel pity.
Every ancient Tharavad ( Khandaan ) of Kerala had ( my family still has ) one or two Kaavu ( small forest area untouched and left for wild animals like snake / jungle fowls & animals. Many of these Kaavus consists small water tanks or wells. Our ancestors may have cleared forests to build houses so they realised that they are occupying the house of these poor animals. So they must have built this for them. Now when the new generation Hindus sell these properties to Christians or Muslims the first thing they do is clear the Kaavus !. What a pity !
These Kaavus provide natural habitat for birds and small animals and no one hurts them in the Kaavu. The water bodies in this Kaavus are actually harvesting rain water and storing for the whole community ( irrespective of the relegion, caste and creed )and ofcourse for all including animals ! We do not use the water directly from it but it becomes a source for other wells & tanks indirectly. Some Kaavus are spread across acres of land. Our State Govt. is always at the mercy of the minority communities so they do nothing to protect these. On the other hand the Govt. spends money to promote rain water harvesting & build cement tanks near building & houses. What a pity again !
I think Hindusim is the only religion where nature is an itegral part of the day to day life and yet we are not animists. Unlike the African animists we have a philosophy and yet have great affinity towards all nature’s creations.
Another important thing why Bonsai did not flourish in India like China is because of our beliefs. Although lately some fashionable people are perhaps thinking that plants have no life of their own.
Rubber trees are brought by Europeans and the first community to embrace the cultivation are Christians in Kerala. Rubber milk is the blood of the tree. You create a wound on the trunk to extract it !
For medicinal purposes we may be doing this to other trees but to a very small extent. Rubber cutivation requires bleeding of thousands of trees on a regular basis !.
Many families in India did not take to Silk worm cultivation ( serie culture ) because of the cruelty involved in it.
It is indeed a pity our secular governments have never highlighted these nature loving habits as great contribution by hinduism to our country. Our secular historians paint it as an Indian culture which they say has contributions from the religions of Invaders.
loading...
loading...
Yes, Hindus are nature lovers and Hinduism is also about nature worshiping..
loading...
loading...
I endorse your thoughts .. when you talk about Hinduism .. you actually end up talking “”about environment, pollution, moral values, human duties towards nature and other humans and other life forms.. the food we eat..”"
My religion has GEMS for the mankind to flourish in all aspects of life.
loading...
loading...
@Dev
I want to share this knowledge with each and every person on this planet… just to get the true picture out.. It will be possible only if people like you start spreading the word by doing even things as simple as forwarding emails with links to these articles…
I feel my efforts have been worth it only if more people who currently dont know the truth, realize it…
Sp, Please spread the words! Its not just about religion.. its about environment, pollution, moral values, human duties towards nature and other humans and other life forms.. the food we eat..
loading...
loading...
To Gurudev ..
Excellent .. Your too good. I read your complete reply to Geeta. I am very pleased with your reply. Let me tell you in the process, many of my own doubts got clarified.
Good Geeta asked such questions..
I feel so disappointing that we go by others’ words than actually taking efforts to find out the truth behind what is said.
loading...
loading...
@Bachodi
Yes “”Aham Brahmasmi”" is definitely vedic, repeated in upanishads many times, like for instance in Brhadaranyaka Upanishad 1.4.10
Upanishads also say Ayam. Atma Brahma – this Self is Brahman, the God! This is from Mandakya Upanishad
loading...
loading...
Wonderful post ,
One thing .. is “”aham brahmasmi “” vedic ? I always thouht its punch line of dwita siddanta by madhwacharya.
loading...
loading...
@Geeta
Again you are stating wrong facts! Read my post http://hitxp.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/caste-system-is-not-vedic/
Chaturvarna is NOT caste system and untouchability! It was classification based on the type of work people did, just like we have politicians, defense, scholars/scientists and others.
The only difference was in those days children used to usually follow the occupation of their parents! Even then there were exceptions. Valimiki was not a brahmin! Vishwamitra was not a brahmin! etc. If there was caste system in those days, do you think they would have been accepted?
Just because some vested interests converted chaturvarna system into a caste system, do not blame it on the religion.
Which part of the planet is that you said, “girls cannot take part in thread ceremony”. In my own threading ceremony there were more women around than men! More than 30 authors of the vedas, the sacred texts taught after the threading ceremony, are women! And do you think the same texts ban women from threading ceremony! Come on..
You said your source was some local priest. I have talked to alsmot every priest of the temples I have been to. More than half of them dont know the vedic language beyond basic Sanskrit words!! Many times they spell out wrong mantras! Which is why I repeatedly said, donot rely on somebody for information, especially something as important as this.
Sati was a symbol of immortal love, when the husband passed away. Not forced immolation. Just because some mad people forced it on some women please dont blame it on religion. If you know the story of Mahabharatha, Rajmata Satyavati, Kunti, Uttara, etc… they lost their husbands, but yet did not do Sati, nor were they forced to, why? Because Sati was not an imposition, only when a wife felt that she cannot live without her husband she used to commit sati, like how Madri, wife of Pandu did. She holds herself responsible for the death of her husband, who had been cursed with death if he ever had intercourse. He died while performing the forbidden act with Madri, who blamed herself for not having rejected his advances, although she was well aware of the curse. In fact the other wife of Pandu, Kunti doesnt commit sati, nor anybody forces her! Why cant you understand the difference?
Even in Ramayana, Tara the wife of Vali after Vali’s death wants to commit sati, but Hanuman and Sugreeva persuade her not to do so and finally she DOES NOT commit sati. Sati was NOT something like a compulsory ritual. Do you know where the name Sati came from. It was Dakshayini who first did this act, she was the wife of Shiva! She committed self immolation (from where the name Sati came) not because her husband died, her husband was still very much alive, but because her father was ABUSING her husband! She felt humiliated by this and committed self immolation which when her husband came to know, he got angry and sent an army to destroy her father’s (his father in law) rituals!
Now you tell me whether sati is based on love for husband or on widowhood? Please get your facts right.
The often claimed rig vedic hymn saying that it supports sati is
??? ??????????? ??????????????? ??????? ????????? |
???????.??????? ??????? ? ??????? ????????????? || (10.18.7)
Ask any sanskrit scholar, nowhere does this hymn mention about a widow! It actually talks about just married women! The part which is blamed to be talking about sati in this verse does not mention about widows nor about sati. It actually says “”first let the dames go up to where he lieth”. It is the tradition of where the woman first enters her husband’s house with her right leg in.
Prejudiced sanskrit translators have twisted the word “yonim agre” (foremost) into “yomiagne” (which means fire) and unfortunately people refer to this nonsense version of yomiagne! No where does the original rigveda says yomiagne in this verse! It is “yonim agre”. And where is a reference to a widow in this verse? It is about just married woman.
If people have enough patience to read the very next hymn in Rigveda i.e 10.18.8, it is about widows. Here it is
???????? ??????? ??????? ??????????? ??? ??? |
???????????? ????????????? ???????????????? ??????? || (10.18.8)
It says “Rise, come unto the world of life, O woman — come, he is lifeless by whose side thou liest. Wifehood with this thy husband was thy portion, who took thy hand and wooed thee as a lover”. Where is sati here? Does it make any sense if 10.18.7 had talked about sati??
Also, You have again not answered any of the points I raised or the questions I asked!! What do you have to say about all the great things mentioned in vedas and ancient texts about women? In fact as I have shown above, there is no disrespect to any woman anywhere in the ancient texts! There is only distortion by so called scholars and experts!
About Tulsidas, I have already clarified above what it means and you didnt even mention anything about it! First of all, nor is Tulsidas any hindu authority, he was a recent person in history, even if he said something wrong that does not become religious teaching, he is not an authority or source of hindu philosophy. Do not attribute what some people in recent history said or did to the religion. The sacred texts do not endorse it.
You said “”some sort of movement going on where they are trying to get these words, specifically the words by Tulsidas, removed from the texts!”". Even if Tulsidas had said something really wrong, then his entire works should be banned right? Not just remove some words or sentences!
While great scientists like Einstein, Oppenheimer, Heisenberg, Bohr, Schrodinger, Planck etc used to read and quote from the vedas! Do you know this? Oppenheimer quoted vedas when he conducted the first atomic test in modern history! I think they were well informed about vedic texts than Indians themselves.
People who dont even know Sanskrit pass judgement on vedas! Wish all the vedic women Maitryie, Gargi, Lopamudra etc were present here today. We could have heard from their own words what the vedas really mean!
By the way may I suggest you to read this too! http://hitxp.wordpress.com/2007/06/17/woman-india-and-america/
Cheers
Guru
loading...
loading...
I am reading contradictions in your own posts!! And no, I don’t know Sanskrit, but I do know enough to verify the texts with the Pandit in the local Sanatan Temple. Also when I discuss this with some of my very religious and learned Hindu friends, including elders, who go to this temple, and who go to all the Dhams, and to various pilgrimages, they are very apologetic and they tell me that there is some sort of movement going on where they are trying to get these words, specifically the words by Tulsidas, removed from the texts! They are also very apologetic about other facets regarding women, be it long time ago, such as Sati. Or the fact that their daughters cannot take part in the Thread Ceremony. The list goes on. Not to mention other very serious topics such as untouchability.
I was hoping to have a healthy exchange of ideas and information, and not to get into a drawn-out argument which, in my humble opinion, appears to be your intent. Your last sentence appears to be loaded with ego. If there is anyone you want to pity, it should be yourself. Reading your spin, I am reminded of the ostrich’s head in the sand. Feel free to believe whatever you want to believe. The facts speak for themselves. This is the end of my posts. All the best.
loading...
loading...
@Geeta
Forgot your mentioning about Tulsidas. Here is what it means.
Have you heard about an english saying called “”A spaniel, a wife and a walnut tree; the more you beat them, the better they be”". Here beating means not punishing or physical assault. Instead it means educating, carving out the best, getting out the best. Tulsidas meant, the more you educate or teach or train them, the best you can get out of them! Educated women, education for backward people, education for illiterates, is very necessary, he said.
You dont beat a drum to make noise, you beat a drum to get music and rhythm out of it. You dont beat a drum mindlessly without any purpose!
A sculptor hits thousands of times on a stone, not to destroy the stone, but to create a beautiful sculpture.
Try to understand things before jumping into conclusions. Have you read the complete Ramacharita Manas and seen what else Tulsidas has said about women? I bet you havent
loading...
loading...
@Geeta
This is a problem with the so called educated society, that a lie repeated 110 times looks like a truth! In the age of internet, a lie pasted on 110 websites looks like a truth!
From where did you copy paste these Vedic translations madam? Do you know Sanskrit? Have you read the Vedas? Just dont do some google search and copy paste things. All those vedic translations you have pasted are from the Max Muller and British era (When British ruled India) who were hell bent on proving that everything that is Indian is wrong and bad and everything that is western is good and great, just to make Indians submissive to the colonial powers. Even the Aryan Invasion theory which is an utter flop today is from the same era.
People who dont know ABCD of sanskrit translate vedic texts into English with their own interpretations and then the so called educated(?), intelligent people like you become the messengers of their translations! Nobody even bothers to look at the original texts.
Before giving specific answers to the quotes you have mentioned above, get some facts straight. Did you ever know the fact that many Vedic hymns were written by women themselves like Ghosha, Lopamudra, Sulabha Maitreyi, and Gargi? Have you ever read the wonderful knowledge they have written into the vedic texts? See this link http://hinduism.about.com/library/weekly/aa031601c.htm
Would this have been possible if the vedic texts and the society at that time were against women? Name just one another religion on this planet where the religious texts are written by women? You cant !!
The same Rigveda that you have mentioned above contains 10 hymns by a woman, Maitreyi! Apart from the male sages, there are more than 30 woman authors who have wrote various Rig Vedic hymns!
The same Rigveda if you had really read on your own, would
have told you in 10.85, the marriage hymn, explicitly that ‘the daughter in law should be treated like a queen (samrajni)’
Another Rigvedic Hymn 10.27.12 states that ‘The woman should have complete rights to decide who her husband should be’. Do you know about swayamvaras in ancient India or is it selective amnesia?
For other readers who dont know about Swayamvara, it was the practice in ancient India (you can see it in ALL ANCIENT INDIAN STORIES) where all the eligible prince (males) would line up to marry a female (usually a princess) and the princess would DECIDE whom she wanted to marry by garlanding that prince of her choice. You will never read about a story in ancient Hindu texts where females were lined up and the male came to decide whom he wants to marry! It was always the women who decided! Even when the king Shantanu in Mahabharatha wanted to marry a poor girl Satyavati in her kingdom, he had to get her permission and convince her before she finally agrees!
Manusmriti another ancient hindu text says, “”Yatra naaryastu pujyante, ramante tatra devatah; Yatraitaastu na pujyante, savaastatra aphalah kriyah”" which means “”Where women are respected and worshipped, there all Gods and Goddesses live and bless the people. Where they are not, all efforts remain fruitless and nothing will succeed’ !
Coming back to @Geeta who has commented to my article above, I suggest you to go learn sanskrit and then read the actual Sanskrit books, understand them and then come to argue if you still have a point to make. Dont show your foolishness by copy pasting incorrect translations by people who dont know the ABCD of sanskrit! Sanskrit is not a word to word translation. It is a context based language by its very own nature! The very meaning of a word depends on what context it is used in.
Suppose I say something like this “”Women are the greatest creation of God. But if God had created women with all bad qualities that many men have, then Women would have been the worst creation of God!”".
Now what if some half baked soul picks up only what I said in the end, then starts spreading a rumour saying “”In line 3 Gurudev said ”Women are the worst creation of God”"! Note that he also has changed what I said from ‘would have been’ to ‘are’ (because either he doesnt know sanskrit or he deliberately wants to twist the story). And others start quoting him everywhere, like you quoted just now! You people wont even look at what else is said by me like “”Women are the greatest creation of God.”"!
Atharva-Veda 14.1.43-44 says that when a woman gets married and enters her husband’s house, she enters “like how a river enters into a sea” (sea becomes saltish and dead without its rivers!) and “ she enters to rule the house along with her husband, like a queen, presiding over the other family members”
I can as well make a dead lock to your arguments by quoting the above vedic verses which show the greatest respect to woman. But winning the debate with you is not my intention. My intention is trying to make you realise the truth.
Do you think it is a bunch of jokers who wrote the vedas, that in one place they say something and then say something totally opposite in another place? First get your facts right. Validate and verify your source of information, dont blindly believe what somebody says. Go to the actual book, learn its language, read and understand it, then you will have the real eligibility to debate on it.
The most unfortunate thing is that Hindus and people within India itself dont know about Hinduism and Vedas as much as people from outside India, people who are not Hindus know!
These outsiders have come to India, learnt sanskrit, read and understood the ancient Indian texts, hindu scriptures, vedas etc, and appreciated its message. So I suggest one such reading for you below
http://www.stephen-knapp.com/women_in_vedic_culture.htm
If you still want to believe that ancient vedic texts , the sacred sources of Hinduism ill treat(?) women, I can only pity you!
loading...
loading...
I am in complete agreement with Mai. And I want to add that your response to Mai, as in your original post, contained more inaccuracies.
For example, this is what you wrote:
“”Not a single sacred text of Hindus degrades women.”"
I suggest you look up some of the following texts:
1- Rigveda (8.33.17)
It is very difficult to control a woman because their intelligence is crooked and their Samkalpa can not be suppressed.
2- Rigveda (10.95.15)
The friendship and love of a woman is never to be trusted because their heart is like that of a wolf.
3- Yajurveda Shatpath Brahmin (5.3.2.2/14.1.1.31)
A woman without son is bad omen and any woman, shudra, dog and crow always carry lies and sins with them.
4- Satapatha Brahmana (5:3:1:13)
A discarded wife is one who has no son. … For a wife that is without a son, is possessed with Nirriti (destruction, calamity).
5- Tulsidas says in Ramcharitmanas- Dhol Ganwar shudra pashu nari, ye sab tadan ke adhikari – A drum, an idiot, a shudra and a woman all need severe beating.
loading...
loading...
@Mai
On your comment “Sikhs are not Hindus”
That is what I had said in my entire post. The core difference between Hinduism and other religions.
You cannot be a Christian, Muslim or Sikh and then say that I will worship God of different religion! Your religion wont allow that!
Unfortunately that has created all kinds of problems on this planet where every religion wants to prove its God to be the real God and we end up with things like Islamic Fundamentalism, Khalistan movement etc. See http://hitxp.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/root-of-all-evil/
Where as in Hinduism you can still be a Hindu and still say that I will worship Jesus or Allah or go to a Sikh Gurudwara. In fact I myself go to other places of worship. There is no objection for this in the Hindu sacred texts. This is because in Hinduism God is one and the same, no matter by what name you call him/her!
loading...
loading...
@Mai
Please dont get confused between what people are doing and what the sacred texts have taught. None of the Hindu texts have asked to illtreat anybody. Be it a dalit or a woman. Infact there is no concept of caste system at all in the sacred texts of Hinduism!! It is a system created by vested interests. Please see http://hitxp.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/caste-system-is-not-vedic/
Do you know when was this concept of OBC or Other Backward Castes created? Not by ancient Indian texts or Hindu religion, but by dirty politicians for their politican gain in as recent times as 1990. See http://hitxp.wordpress.com/2006/05/29/who-is-an-obc/ for details. When was SC and ST created and for how long? http://hitxp.wordpress.com/2007/04/09/story-behind-obc/ India is the only country in the world where people prefer to be called as backward because of the benefits they get from the government by this. Dalits or backward castes are a vote bank today. Understand the truth before making such serious comments.
Coming back to women, none of vedic texts say that a widow is bad. Note that Kunti in Mahabharatha was a widow herself and yet she is always called RajaMata (Mother Queen)! Is there any instance where Kunti was called a bad omen?? Do you know Vedic texts were also written by women? Maitreyi, Gargi etc are woman authors of vedic texts.
Not a single sacred text of Hindus degrades women. Vedas say ‘Yatra Naaryastu Poojyanthe Ramanthe Tatra Devataha’, which means at places where people worship and respect women, in those places Gods will roam!
The most powerful of the Hindu Gods are female not male! Be it Kali or Shakti or Durga. Dont get sarcastic about a religion based on what some people do.
How did an hindu woman rule entire India for almost 20 years in its past 60 years of Independence? I am talking about Indira Gandhi. She was also a widow! Even today you can find 4-5 woman Chief Ministers of State in India. Read about this http://hitxp.wordpress.com/2007/06/17/woman-india-and-america/
Take Sikhs for instance. Just because there is a Khalistan movement I wont call entire Sikhism as terrorists. There are frequent news reports on CNN-IBN and NDTV about how Sikh girls get cheated by Sikh guys from abroad who marry them for huge dowry hiding the fact that they are already married! The Sikh girls come back to India crying about how they were ill treated by their husbands.
I also know how the woman dancers are ill treated in some of the Sikh weddings and parties. There was an interview on CNN IBN with the Mumbai dance bar girls who went to Punjab after the ban on dance bars in Mumbai. They said that they were treated with more dignity in Mumbai dance bars than in the Sikh weddings. Now, just based on that one cant say all Sikhs illtreat women, right?
But just because some people ill treated some woman you said entire Hinduism ill treats woman!! Hinduism also existed during the ancient Kingdoms of Magadha, Pataliputra, Maurya, Ashoka, Bindusara, Rashtrakutas, Vijayanagar Empire, Harshavardhana, Pulikeshi, Cheras, Cholas, Pandyas, Shivaji etc. Why dont you hear any stories of dalits or lower castes in any of these times. Why dont you hear about religion ill treating woman or people in any of these times? It all started by vested interests in recent history and got glorified and supported by the British who divided India based on caste creed and religion to make it easy for them to rule India.
Do you know about the Great Sikh Guru who fought against the forced conversion of Hindus to Islam by the Mughal rulers? Would he have done that if he had not felt good about Hinduism?
There is a difference between commenting on people and commenting on religion.
loading...
loading...
As a Sikh, far be it from me to criticise your belief system, but it seems you’re leaving a few things out, like the very ‘tolerant’(that’s sarcastic, in case you missed my tone of voice) caste system which is an integral part of the Hindu culture/religion. I just read a news story about a Dalit (the current polite word for ‘untouchable’) woman whose two children starved to death because no one at the health centre would help a Dalit woman get the card for free milk.
Or how about the treatment, even today, of widows as ‘bad luck to be avoided.’
Or the disrespect shown to women, in general, in Hindu culture. How ironic that a religion that worships Woman as a goddess also despises her as less than a real human being, that is, a man.
I wouldn’t dream of compelling anyone to believe or live as I do under any circumstances. I wouldn’t even suggest it to them. It is a difficult way to live, but also, for me highly satisfying and fulfilling. (An slight aside, RSS notwithstanding, Sikhs are not Hindus.)
I am delighted that your religion/way of life suits you so well. But please don’t overlook the facts. Hinduism has its dark side, too.
loading...
loading...