Why did the Ancient Indians invent Zero ?
To indicate Nothing in a place value based numerical system, like the binary, decimal etc.
So in the number 101, 0 means there is NO value in the tenth’s place. If there was no zero then 101 should have been written as 11, which leaves no room to differentiate between actual 11 and 101. The introduction of a new symbol, o to indicate Nothingness solved this problem. In other words, Zero was invented by ancient Indians NOT as a main concept, instead it was a feature required by the place value system which they originally invented.
If a team scores zero goals in a soccer match, it means the team has scored NO goals.
If a student scores zero marks in an exam, it means the student has scored NOTHING
and so on
Now let us see how the idea of zero has become non-zero in some of the contexts.
The arrays used in computer programming languages have a zero based index!
For those who dont know what an array means in a software program, well it is just a sequential collection of things. The thing can be a number, a text, an object etc.
In an array this each thing can be accessed by just using a number (called index) which denotes the position of that thing in the array.
An example of an array would be
Weekdays = [Sunday,'Monday,'Tuesday,'Wednesday,'Thursday,'Friday,'Saturday]
Here Weekdays is an array containing a list of the names of the days of a week.
Now there is something non-zero about zero here. Zero is not Nothing here, its actually Something!
For instance, to access the first item Sunday in this array, we will have to say Weekdays[0] !!
This is what we mean when we say, zero-based index, i.e item positions have to be counted as 0,1,2,3 etc, NOT as 1,2,3,4 etc
Shouldn’t it have been Weekdays[1], since Sunday is the first term, not zeroth in the array?
All C-like languages (C,C++,Java,C# etc) implement this concept of zero based index.
Some Non C-like languages like Visual Basic on the other hand followed one based index, even though off late Visual Basic.Net has converted to zero based index! There is conversion even in computer programming languages
So in these C-like languages which rule almost the entire computer programming industry, when software developers say Zeroth index, they actually mean First Item!
This concept of non-zero usage of zero is not just limited to arrays or computers either. Have a look at some other cases.
The ground floor of a building in US is indicated in an elevator by 1′ (which makes sense), where as in India it is 0′! 0 going by its mathematical definition means there is no such floor, so it shouldn’t be there in an elevator at all unless and until that elevator takes us on a time travel
The current Gregorian calendar does not have 0 CE! Because 0 CE means there is no such year! The calendar directly jumps from 1 BCE to 1 CE which is quite natural when you consider the definition of Zero
Having said this, why do we start with zeroth index in almost all computer programming languages?
The reason is because it makes things easy in terms of computational purpose. Suppose there are N items in an array, then the zero based index means representing each item’s index as
0 < i < N
On the other hand, using 1 based index would mean
1 < i < N+1
As you can see, the ease of zero based index is,
- In terms of representation you dont need any number greater than the number of elements N
- You dont need additional overhead of adding 1 every time you compare with the upper bound, in other words in zero based index the upper bound is the number of elements itself, where as in 1 based index it is NOT.
- The zero based index of an item also denotes the number of items prior to the current item
Now what about 1 < i < N ? Well, in the above two cases the difference between the bounds gives the number of items in the array, where as in this case it gives N-1
In other words, zero based index provides more scope for optimization while compiling.
Division By Zero
I have asked this to question to many people, and sadly nobody gave me a satisfactory answer! The question is of a very elementary mathematical concept. How can we say that
Division of any number by zero = infinity
We have been doing this mathematics ever since our primary school. But to accept something without inquiring into its accuracy, is unscientific. I dont do math without understanding it, instead I prefer not to do it if I dont understand it, for I am not a computer to do things without understanding what it means. Deep Blue might have defeated Kasparov in Chess, but it never understood what it was doing/calculating while playing with Kasparov
I have seen a lot of people who do differential calculus without even understanding the meaning of limit, continuity, differentiation etc. They simply apply formula and get answers without even understanding what they are doing, just like how machines(computers) work!
If we solve problems with such an approach, then we get lost into the symbols of mathematical equations and we end up wandering on the path instead of marching firmly towards the destination.
I am not saying dont do mathematics. All I am saying is dont do mathematics without understanding what you are doing. Summation of indices in tensors without understanding the purpose is a total waste of time and energy. Abstraction at the cost of understanding is of no use.
If we do mathematics without understanding what exactly we are doing, then we wont even know when we are wrong, and there are very little chances that we will discover it, unless and until we happen to check the correct answer.
Not that we wont do mistakes if we understand what we are doing. But the chances are less, or at least we will understand the mistake!
Coming back to division by zero, it simply means, division by Nothing. Now how can that become infinity?
We should remember that while multiplication is repeated addition, division is repeated subtraction. So 23 means repeatedly add 2, 3 times. Where as 6/3 means how many times can I repeatedly subtract 3 from 6 till I run out of everything in 6?
So when we say 30=0, we mean dont add 3, not even once, which means there will be nothing left which is Zero.
On the other hand, 6/0 means how many times can I remove Nothing from 6 till I run out of everything in 6? Well, as many times as we want, because no matter how many nothing’s we remove from 6, the 6 still remains!! So any number divided by zero is infinity, because you can remove infinite nothings out of something!
Now what about zero divided by something? For instance 0/6?
Well, here it means how many sixes can I remove from Zero? The answer is none! Because zero is Nothing, there is nothing you can remove from zero. So zero divided by a number is Zero.
Okie, finally what about zero divided by zero (0/0)?
What it means is, how many nothings can I remove from nothing till nothing is left?
Well, Undefined is a polite mathematical way of saying, the question is stupid
Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2010
loading...
loading...






Here is a mathematical equation created around the year 1800 by the philosopher Friedrich Schlegel which addresses this absurd idea of dividing by zero.
http://mathematicalpoetry.blogspot.com/2006/08/friedrich-schlegels-mask-of-god.html
loading...
loading...
Aspara,
Its very interesting that you discovered that relationship about ego and dividing by zero … I think it may be more common than people would think. Here it is again (link)
http://mathematicalpoetry.blogspot.com/2007/06/love-and-ego.html
Thanks!
Kaz
loading...
loading...
Really cool Komila, perfect
Soul is nothing, yet present in everything.. just like zero..
Universe/world is that everything which contains infinite nothing, which is the definition of God/universal consciousness, which is again nothing but the soul itself! Advaita!
loading...
loading...
Fantastic post..it is quite philospical & absolutely, logical !!
Multiply : World x soul/atman = soul/atman
Divide: World/Soul = God or Soul/World = God
Add.subtract: World +/- Soul = World
where, world being ne number and sould being nothing/zero…inifite results relates to GOD..
it took me lot of time to get results, but it was fun interpreting the same…
Thoughts/corrections are all welcome.
loading...
loading...
Well said Apsara, philosophical math
Kislay, dont worry about somebody writing wrong things, truth cant be hidden for a long time
As for 0/0, it is ‘undefined’, there is nothing more to worry about it. It simply means, how many times can we remove nothing, out of nothing, so that nothing is left!!
Thanks Viji and Phani
loading...
loading...
The best post by far… i have forwarded this post to all my friends!!
loading...
loading...
Another nice article.
Division by zero can be said this way also,
6/3 means, how many 3′s are there in 6.
so for 6/0 it can be.. how many 0′s are there in 6. This statement is absurd and so is infinity.
loading...
loading...
This is an established fact that Ancient Indians invented the zero , right ? Recently I read a book called Holy Cow by Sarah MacDonald , and in that book the author says that zero was invented by Indians but somebody from Damascus . I tell you it really pissed me off . And regarding 0/0 , George Cantor went mad trying to find the value of infinity , so I guess the question is not that stupid . Watch the documentary Dangerous Knowledge if you got time . Its about George Cantor, Ludwig Boltzmann, Kurt Gödel and Alan Turing .
loading...
loading...
Hi GD, excellent philosophical math post!
Now, am intrigued here. You said:
Division of any number by zero = infinity.
What about if I translate it into this:
Cut your ego till you are gone (nothingness), then ‘you’ will get the Infinite. Call it the Universe, the Multiverse, your true self, whatever.
And about 0/6 = 0 or 0/1 million = 0…
It seems to me that the Grand Nothingness remains the same, whatever you do to it. Take anything from it, add anything from it the Grand Zero is the same.
Mountain is still mountain. Rose is still rose, as you said somewhere
It’s intriguing how basic maths can actually explain some basic stuffs of spirituality.
loading...
loading...